We do not have a roadmap on what direction ImaNote should be developed, but there are some work carried out that will help us to make decisions on the next steps. What we have:
(1) formal usability study and preliminary report of it made by Mariana,
(2) informal and non-specific ideas, comment and feedback from test users in the Media Lab,
(3) some specific ideas and comments from expert users.
Here is a list of specific ideas to think about (thank you Smau!):
- Crude marking / drawing on top of image (freeform pen) (hide / show these so they don’t detract from enjoying the image)
- Adding a sound file to a certain spot (speech annotation or related sound link)
- Would crudge MNG / GIF animation be possible ? An animation would allow for time sequenced event portrayals and their time based annotations. That is, an MNG image could show 5 stages of a butterfly development as a slow animation with play/stop/rewind/forward controls. One could then annotate each phase in development (a separate frame). Feeds could also then be viewed sequentially in time (1st frame annotations, 2nd frame, etc.)
- One annotation content in two positions in two images, with side by side comparision of images. You could annotate two images with same text so people could compare them. Or even if not same annotation, side-by-side images would help in image comparison, analysis and discussion tasks (and their related annotation). Example: arts related annotatoin of two related paintings, Before & after comparison of images of sketches with annotation. Risk: becomes a discussion tool.
- Many ways to view annotations: date of adding, place in the map (i.e. closest to spot X that I pointed on the image), based on poster, based on keywords (metadata), based on.
- Identification of annotations visibly on the image (nubers, names, tags, something?)